da free john

The only article during this week’s reading was an article you (Dr. Lane) wrote. The only reference to “Da Free John” was his fictitious involvement in a discussion involving other philosophers. I could be way out there but the only thing (from that reading) that comes to mind is that the “message” or information being disseminated should stand on its own merit. Who or where the information is coming from should not dilute nor add credence to the message.